{"id":91288,"date":"2022-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-11-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/09\/aha-other-defibrillation-strategies-studied-for-refractory-v-fib\/"},"modified":"2022-11-11T22:43:48","modified_gmt":"2022-11-11T22:43:48","slug":"aha-other-defibrillation-strategies-studied-for-refractory-v-fib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/2022\/11\/09\/aha-other-defibrillation-strategies-studied-for-refractory-v-fib\/","title":{"rendered":"AHA: Other Defibrillation Strategies Studied for Refractory V-Fib"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>\n<p>Survival to hospital discharge higher with use of double sequential external defibrillation compared with standard defibrillation<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p>WEDNESDAY, Nov. 9, 2022 (HealthDay News) &#8212; For patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, use of double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) or vector-change (VC) defibrillation results in better survival to hospital discharge compared with standard defibrillation, according to a study published online Nov. 6 in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine<\/em> to coincide with the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2022, held from Nov. 5 to 7 in Chicago.<\/p>\n<p>Sheldon Cheskes, M.D., from the University of Toronto, and colleagues conducted a cluster-randomized trial among six Canadian paramedic services to assess DSED and VC defibrillation compared to standard defibrillation in adults with refractory ventricular fibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Data were included for 405 patients: 136, 144, and 125 were randomly assigned to receive standard defibrillation, VC defibrillation, and DSED, respectively. The data and safety monitoring board stopped the trial due to the coronavirus pandemic.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers found that compared with the standard group, survival to hospital discharge was more common in the DSED and VC groups (30.4 and 21.7 percent, respectively, versus 13.3 percent; relative risks [95 percent confidence intervals], 2.21 [1.33 to 3.67] and 1.71 [1.01 to 2.88], respectively). A higher percentage of patients had a good neurologic outcome with DSED but not VC defibrillation compared with standard defibrillation (relative risks [95 percent confidence intervals], 2.21 [1.26 to 3.88] and 1.48 [0.81 to 2.71], respectively).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Although the outcomes favored DSED, the logistics of having a second defibrillator available may be a challenge in some paramedic services,&#8221; the authors write.<\/p>\n<p>One author disclosed financial ties to ZOLL Medical.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1056\/NEJMoa2207304\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Abstract\/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMe2213562\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/professional.heart.org\/en\/meetings\/scientific-sessions\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">More Information<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Copyright \u00a9 2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.healthday.com\/\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener\">HealthDay<\/a>. All rights reserved.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Survival to hospital discharge higher with use of double sequential external defibrillation compared with standard defibrillation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":91426,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11],"class_list":["post-91288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91288"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91288\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":91368,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91288\/revisions\/91368"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/91426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}