Alternate-day fasting the only intermittent-fasting diet strategy to show benefit versus continuous energy restriction<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n
By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter<\/b>
\n<\/b><\/p>\n
MONDAY, June 30, 2025 (HealthDay News) — Intermittent-fasting strategies yield small reductions in body weight compared with an ad libitum diet, according to a study published online June 18 in The BMJ<\/em>.<\/p>\n Zhila Semnani-Azad, Ph.D., from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, and colleagues examined the effect of intermittent-fasting diets with continuous energy restriction or unrestricted (ad libitum) diets on intermediate cardiometabolic outcomes in a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The study included 99 randomized clinical trials involving 6,582 adults.<\/p>\n The researchers found that when compared with an ad libitum diet, all intermittent-fasting and continuous energy restriction diet strategies reduced body weight. Alternate-day fasting was the only form of intermittent-fasting diet strategy to show benefit in body weight reduction compared with continuous energy restriction (mean difference, \u22121.29 kg). Alternate-day fasting showed a trivial reduction in body weight when compared with both time-restricted eating and whole-day fasting (mean difference, \u22121.69 and \u22121.05 kg). Among trials with less than 24 weeks follow-up, estimates were similar, but benefits in weight reduction were only seen in diet strategies compared with ad libitum in moderate-to-long-term trials (\u226524 weeks). Compared with time-restricted eating, alternate-day fasting lowered total cholesterol, triglycerides, and nonhigh-density lipoprotein in comparisons between intermittent-fasting strategies. Time-restricted eating resulted in a small increase in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with whole-day fasting.<\/p>\n “In our analysis, intermittent-fasting strategies showed trivial to small improvements in body weight reduction,” the authors write.<\/p>\n Several authors disclosed ties to relevant organizations.<\/p>\n