By Robin Foster HealthDay Reporter<\/b><\/p>\n
<\/b><\/p>\n
MONDAY, Sept. 16, 2024 (HealthDay News) — In a disclosure that can’t eliminate the possibility that bird flu may have spread from one human to another for the first time, U.S. health officials have reported that a person who lived with a Missouri resident infected with H5N1 became sick the same day.<\/p>\n
That close contact “was also ill at the same time, was not tested, and has since recovered,” the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a weekly flu report<\/a> released Friday.<\/p>\n Still, CDC officials told the New York Times<\/em> on Friday night that there was \u00e2\u0080\u009cno epidemiological evidence at this time to support person-to-person transmission of H5N1,\u00e2\u0080\u009d although more research is needed.<\/p>\n The close contact did experience gastrointestinal symptoms, which can be a sign of influenza infection, the CDC added.<\/p>\n Before the Friday report was posted, neither the CDC nor Missouri health officials had mentioned the close contact\u00e2\u0080\u0099s illness.<\/p>\n In fact, CDC officials said in a Thursday media briefing that it was unclear how the first patient had become infected and called the case \u00e2\u0080\u009ca one-off.\u00e2\u0080\u009d<\/p>\n And on Thursday evening, Missouri health officials said that \u00e2\u0080\u009call contacts are known and remained asymptomatic during the observation period,\u00e2\u0080\u009d the Times<\/em> reported.<\/p>\n But by Friday, CDC officials acknowledged that the household contact\u00e2\u0080\u0099s illness \u00e2\u0080\u009cshould have been mentioned in the press briefing, along with the additional context,\u00e2\u0080\u009d the Times<\/em> reported, though the risk to the public remains low, officials said.<\/p>\n Still, outside experts criticized the omission.<\/p>\n \u00e2\u0080\u009cThere are absolutely no circumstances in which it is acceptable to not have disclosed that information yesterday,\u00e2\u0080\u009d Jennifer Nuzzo<\/a>, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health, told the Times <\/em>on Friday.<\/p>\n Other experts were frustrated with the general lack of information on the case.<\/p>\n \u00e2\u0080\u009cAside from getting more details on the case, it would be good to get more information on who was included in case investigation and what criteria were used,\u00e2\u0080\u009d Dr. Nahid Bhadelia<\/a>, director of the Center on Emerging Infectious Diseases at Boston University, told the Times<\/em>.<\/p>\n In addition to the household contact, a health worker who cared for the hospitalized patient became ill but tested negative for the flu, the CDC said Friday night, the Times<\/em> reported.<\/p>\n Antibody testing could reveal any exposure to H5N1, and Missouri officials said such tests were \u00e2\u0080\u009cbeing considered,\u00e2\u0080\u009d the Times<\/em> reported.<\/p>\n All the previous U.S. bird flu infections were among people who worked around cows and poultry, so this latest case raises concerns about human transmission of the virus.<\/p>\n “This is the 14th<\/sup>\u00a0human case of H5 [bird flu] reported in the United States during 2024 and the first case of H5 without a known occupational exposure to sick or infected animals,” the CDC noted in a statement<\/a> it released when the Missouri case first surfaced.<\/p>\n Bird flu has been detected in over 200 dairy herds in 14 states<\/a>, but not in Missouri, according to the CDC. Bird flu has also been found in commercial and backyard flocks and in wild birds.<\/p>\n This was the first bird flu case detected through routine influenza surveillance, officials noted.<\/p>\n More information<\/strong><\/p>\n