{"id":112180,"date":"2024-09-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-09-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/04\/likelihood-of-return-for-screening-low-after-false-positive-mammogram\/"},"modified":"2024-09-05T22:12:25","modified_gmt":"2024-09-05T22:12:25","slug":"likelihood-of-return-for-screening-low-after-false-positive-mammogram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/04\/likelihood-of-return-for-screening-low-after-false-positive-mammogram\/","title":{"rendered":"Likelihood of Return for Screening Low After False-Positive Mammogram"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>\n<p>Women more likely to return for additional imaging only, short-interval follow-up, or biopsy after true-negative result<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n<p><b>By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><\/b><\/p>\n<p>WEDNESDAY, Sept. 4, 2024 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Women are less likely to return for subsequent screening after false-positive mammography results, according to a study published online Sept. 3 in the <em>Annals of Internal Medicine<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Diana L. Miglioretti, Ph.D., from the University of California in Davis, and colleagues examined the association between screening mammography results and the probability of subsequent screening in a cohort study involving 3,529,825 screening mammograms (3,184,482 true negatives and 345,343 false positives) performed from 2005 to 2017 among 1,053,672 women aged 40 to 73 years.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers found that the likelihood of returning was higher after a true-negative result than after a false-positive recall for additional imaging only, short-interval follow-up, or biopsy (adjusted absolute difference, \u00e2\u0088\u00921.9, \u00e2\u0088\u009215.9, and \u00e2\u0088\u009210.0 percentage points, respectively). The largest decreases in the probability of returning after a false positive versus a true negative were seen for Asian and Hispanic\/Latino women for short-interval follow-up or biopsy (\u00e2\u0088\u009220 to \u00e2\u0088\u009225 points and \u00e2\u0088\u009213 to \u00e2\u0088\u009214 points, respectively). A false-positive result on the second of two screening mammograms within five years was associated with a reduced probability of returning for a third, irrespective of the first screening result.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Physicians should educate their patients about the importance of continued screening after false-positive results, especially given the associated increased future risk for breast cancer,&#8221; the authors write.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.acpjournals.org\/doi\/10.7326\/M24-0123\">Abstract\/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.acpjournals.org\/doi\/10.7326\/M24-0893\">Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>Copyright \u00a9 2024 <a href=\"https:\/\/consumer.healthday.com\/\" target=\"_new\" rel=\"noopener\">HealthDay<\/a>. All rights reserved.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Women more likely to return for additional imaging only, short-interval follow-up, or biopsy after true-negative result<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":112255,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11],"class_list":["post-112180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112180"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112180\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":112254,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112180\/revisions\/112254"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/112255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medgoo.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}